[lldb-dev] LLDB Evolution

Zachary Turner via lldb-dev lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 11 08:15:16 PDT 2016

It's not possible. The problem is that lldb was dependent on order of
includes because each header wasn't properly including what it used. So
when clang-format reordered this, things broke
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:04 AM Christian Convey via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Hi Pavel,
> Would it make sense to address this problem by fixing clang-format,
> rather than working around it?
> (Assuming the clang-format fix is relatively easy, and acceptable to
> clang-format's maintainers.)
> - Christian
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
> <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > I just committed another  header cleanup commit, which makes lldb
> > clang-format-immune ( = it still compiles after a full reformat) on
> > linux. Other OS's are still likely to have some missed dependencies.
> >
> > However, when I tried running the test suite I got about 150 failures.
> > Based on a sample of the errors, it looks like the problem is that
> > clang format messes up the "// Place breakpoint here" annotations we
> > use in the tests.
> > Therefore, I propose to apply the clang-format to the lldb source code
> > only as a first step. After that, as a second step, we can go through
> > the tests and fix them up so that the comment markers are where we
> > expect them to be.
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20160811/6b9adfdf/attachment.html>

More information about the lldb-dev mailing list