[lldb-dev] Looking for info on two rdars: 18684124, 15367233
Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 14 07:35:19 PDT 2015
Those radars are both listed as fixed. I'm building and will run the tests
on OS X to verify I don't see them here. Assuming they pass, I'll strip
the xfail marker.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
> Checking the disposition of these now.
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
>> We have a chunk of tests that are marked xfail that pass right now on OS
>> X. I'll go through those in the near future.
>> I'm also seeing several tests consistently unexpectedly pass on Linux
>> x86_64 (Ubuntu 14.04) built with clang-3.6. I think at least some of them
>> fail with gcc-4.9, so they might need to be marked up based on the
>> compiler. I plan to look at those soonish as well.
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Ed Maste via lldb-dev <
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> Two tests are currently decorated with a @unittest2.expectedFailure
>>> referencing rdar tickets. These tests pass consistently for me on
>>> FreeBSD. Can I ask the Apple folks to look at these tickets and put
>>> details in a public PR if appropriate? Alternatively, shall I switch
>>> the tests to expectedFailureDarwin?
>>> Also, are these tests passing on Linux?
>>> @unittest2.expectedFailure("<rdar://problem/18684124>, lldb doesn't
>>> reliably print the prompt when run under pexpect")
>>> lldb-dev mailing list
>>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lldb-dev