[lldb-dev] CMake & BUILD_SHARED_LIBS
vince at nethacker.com
Mon Jun 1 07:03:35 PDT 2015
Thanks for the patch and thanks for your patience. The release is in 4-6
weeks but there are a lot of people on the team, someone will probably have
a chance to look sooner.
Is there a deadline you are working against?
On Jun 1, 2015 1:16 AM, "Andrew Wilkins" <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 at 16:01 Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote:
>> Le 01/06/2015 09:55, Andrew Wilkins a écrit :
>> On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 at 11:06 Vince Harron < <vince at nethacker.com>
>> vince at nethacker.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>> We're not testing that configuration so I'm not surprised that you're
>>> hitting problems. I'd like to look into it but we're working towards a
>>> release now and this isn't the most critical issue. For today, I recommend
>>> building without this flag.
>> No worries. When would be a good time to ping back? I was hoping to get
>> the packaging updated for 3.7, but that may be too aggressive, and not
>> leave enough time for bug fixing.
>> Also, in case I wasn't clear: I have changes ready, I just thought it
>> might be polite to bring it up here first, since I've not contributed
>> before. Building without the flag isn't really an option for Debian
>> packaging. The autotools-based build already links LLDB libs against
>> libLLVM.so, and it would be best to preserve that.
>> Yep, I confirm that it is needed to move the Debian & Ubuntu packages
>> from autotools to cmake.
>> For now, I have an important number of undefined symbols.
>> Could you send your patch? I would be happy to test that.
> Sure, I've just uploaded it to Phabricator: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10157
> Vince, please feel free to ignore that one for now, as you're busy. I
> don't want to disrupt anyone's work.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lldb-dev