[lldb-dev] swig generation and "six" module

[Zachary Turner via lldb-dev]

I don't mind it being a copy instead of a link, I had just been thinking
about getting rid of that workflow anyway and requiring a pip install.  But
if you can't do that, then scratch that idea.

Feel free to change it to a copy and upstream that if it makes your life
easier.

Just to be clear though, the issue with six is orthogonal to the issue with
static bindings, right?  We couldn't all agree on a way to get static
bindings in, so as of now it's not a thing.  I did some work to get a
swig-as-a-service thing going, and it's mostly complete except for the part
where I get a server and make it run on that server.  If I can push that
through static bindings will be a thing again, but I'm blocked on that for
the moment.

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM Ted Woodward <ted.woodward at codeaurora.org>
wrote:

> Unfortunately, the LLDB we build needs to run on SLES 11, Ubuntu 10+ and
> who knows what else.  I don’t think I can require they install a six
> package. I can make our build do a copy instead of a link, if you want to
> keep it a link.
>
>
>
> Are the static swig bindings checked in yet, or do we still need to run
> swig to generate them on each build?
>
>
>
> --
>
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
>
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
> Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
>
>
> *From:* Zachary Turner [mailto:zturner at google.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 09, 2015 3:47 PM
> *To:* Ted Woodward; LLDB
> *Subject:* Re: [lldb-dev] swig generation and "six" module
>
>
>
> What about requiring that the user has done "pip install six" on their
> machine?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:40 PM Ted Woodward via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> r252764 changes finishSwigPythonLLDB.py to symlink the “six” module in
> site-packages. six.py is a symlink to
> <llvm>/tools/lldb/third_party/Python/module/six/six.py. This assumes I have
> access to this build’s sources when I run lldb, which I don’t – our
> workstations don’t have access to the buildbots’ filesystem, and even if
> they did, the sources may change between build and run.
>
>
>
> Shouldn’t six.py just be copied? It’s only 30k.
>
>
>
> Zach, how do I do a build using static swig bindings? I don’t think we’re
> going to change the bindings internally, so using the standard ones should
> be fine.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
>
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
> Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20151209/a39e528a/attachment.html>