[lldb-dev] test results look typical?

Todd Fiala via lldb-dev lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 24 15:42:14 PDT 2015


On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:

> Can't comment on the failures for Linux, but I don't think we have a good
> handle on the unexpected successes.  I only added that information to the
> output about a week ago, before that unexpected successes were actually
> going unnoticed.
>

Okay, thanks Zachary.   A while back we had some flapping tests that would
oscillate between unexpected success and failure on Linux.  Some of those
might still be in that state but maybe (!) are fixed.

Anyone on the Linux end who happens to know if the fails in particular look
normal, that'd be good to know.

Thanks!


>
> It's likely that someone could just go in there and remove the XFAIL from
> those tests.
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm just trying to get a handle on current lldb test failures across
>> different platforms.
>>
>> On Linux on non-virtualized hardware, I currently see the failures below
>> on Ubuntu 14.04.2 using a setup like this:
>> * stock linker (ld.bfd),
>> * g++ 4.9.2
>> * cmake
>> * ninja
>> * libstdc++
>>
>> ninja check-lldb output:
>>
>> Ran 394 test suites (15 failed) (3.807107%)
>> Ran 474 test cases (17 failed) (3.586498%)
>> Failing Tests (15)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux rad 3.13.0-57-generic
>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux rad 3.13.0-57-generic
>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux rad 3.13.0-57-generic
>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux rad 3.13.0-57-generic
>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>
>> Unexpected Successes (10)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux rad
>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
>>
>>
>>
>> On a similar setup, although bumped up to Ubuntu 14.04.3 and now on a
>> VMWare VM, everything else the same, I see a similar report from 'ninja
>> check-lldb':
>>
>> Ran 394 test suites (17 failed) (4.314721%)
>> Ran 474 test cases (19 failed) (4.008439%)
>> Failing Tests (17)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestAttachResume.py (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic
>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic
>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic
>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepOverWatchpoint.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic
>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>
>> Unexpected Successes (11)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux lldb
>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>> x86_64 x86_64)
>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestWatchedVarHitWhenInScope.py
>> (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
>>
>>
>> Do these more or less match the current state of affairs for Linux
>> tests?  If not, are there any suggestions on best practices for upgrades?
>> A while back I had tried things like clang and libc++ but I had arrived at
>> the above setup (albeit typically with the gold linker) simply due to what
>> worked, what was easy to debug and what built fast.
>>
>> Thanks for any confirmation on that!
>>
>> --
>> -Todd
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>
>


-- 
-Todd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20150824/76aeeaae/attachment.html>


More information about the lldb-dev mailing list