[lldb-dev] [LLVMdev] RFC: LLVM should require a working C++11 <thread>, <mutex>, and <atomic>

Chandler Carruth chandlerc at google.com
Wed Sep 24 10:55:59 PDT 2014

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote:

> The best thing for understanding their reasons is to ask them to speak
> up.

I asked them directly, and this thread is a chance for them to speak up
again. I *think* I've addressed the concerns of those I've spoken to
directly, but there may be other folks or other concerns or I may have
messed it up. =]

> My experience on the MinGW/MinGW-w64 communities is that those who
> choose MinGW is because of ignorance about MinGW-w64 and because there
> are lots of documents on the 'net that references MinGW. MinGW is, to
> all practical effects, a zombie project and there is no reason to prefer
> it over MinGW-w64 nowadays.

:: shrug ::

I'm not such a user, and so I don't want to speculate as to what motivates
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20140924/5fc7bb6a/attachment.html>

More information about the lldb-dev mailing list