[lldb-dev] lldb-mi coding style

Colin Riley colin at codeplay.com
Sat Nov 15 06:27:56 PST 2014

No objections here; it makes sense everything is kept consistent now given the effort with the main codebase.


-----Original Message-----
From: "dawn at burble.org" <dawn at burble.org>
Sent: ‎15/‎11/‎2014 03:59
To: "Zachary Turner" <zturner at google.com>
Cc: "lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu" <lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-mi coding style

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 02:53:24AM +0000, Zachary Turner wrote:
> You'll probably want to wait for some input from the Apple people and the
> Codeplay people before moving forward with reformatting it. However, if the
> decision ends up being to move forward with a reformat, then please do it
> using clang-format.  I have already created a clang format configuration
> file in the lldb repository that is pretty close to what the LLDB standard
> is, and I would like to see us converge toward that.

Yes, we should use clang-format for this.
Thanks for the .clang-format file!

Apple/Codeplay, any objections from your side?
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20141115/d24587b0/attachment.html>

More information about the lldb-dev mailing list