[lldb-dev] lldb-mi coding style

Zachary Turner zturner at google.com
Fri Nov 14 18:53:24 PST 2014

You'll probably want to wait for some input from the Apple people and the
Codeplay people before moving forward with reformatting it. However, if the
decision ends up being to move forward with a reformat, then please do it
using clang-format.  I have already created a clang format configuration
file in the lldb repository that is pretty close to what the LLDB standard
is, and I would like to see us converge toward that.

On Fri Nov 14 2014 at 6:32:30 PM <dawn at burble.org> wrote:

> The coding style in lldb-mi doesn't match the rest of lldb.  It's bad
> enough that lldb doesn't match the rest of llvm/clang or follow llvm's
> developer guidelines, but can we at least be consistant within a single
> repository please?
> To fix this:
> - the original submitters can reformat it, or
> - I can submit patches.  I think there may be a maximum size for patches,
>     so I may have to do this in several sets of patches.
> Any preference?
> We are anxious to get this done quickly because we are working on some
> other fixes to the lldb-mi code and want to minimize the number of
> conflicts
> we have to sort through, as well as keep "svn blame" meaningful.
> Thanks,
> -Dawn
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20141115/0d61277a/attachment.html>

More information about the lldb-dev mailing list