[lldb-dev] (no subject)

Steve Pucci spucci at google.com
Sat Mar 15 09:42:44 PDT 2014


On Linux/gcc, the great majority of warnings is for a warning about using
%p in a printf with a void* argument, which IMHO is a bogus warning that
only gcc emits, and AFAICT can't be disabled without disabling the other
far-more-useful printf warnings.  I wound up writing a script to filter
these out from my build logs rather than try to fix them all.

On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool
<compnerd at compnerd.org>wrote:

> Hi,
> As the LLDB build currently exists, there are a large number of warnings
> which clutter the build.  This is even worse on Linux when building with
> gcc.
> I was wondering if there would be any objection to forcing errors on
> warnings as they as they get cleaned up.  This requires that the compiler
> support marking certain warnings a errors (i.e. -Werror=*).  clang and gcc
> support many of these, and this would need to be conditionalised on
> compiler support to ensure that no one is prevented from continuing to
> build LLDB.
> LLVM actually has buildbots that build with -Werror which helps prevent
> new errors from being integrated in clang and LLVM, unfortunately, the
> buildbot situation for LLDB is not as pretty.  As such, I was wondering if
> it would be acceptable to push this down into the normal build.
> --
> Saleem Abdulrasool
> compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20140315/af2cfc82/attachment.html>

More information about the lldb-dev mailing list