[lldb-dev] Code coverage of llvm, clang, lldb & polly

Tobias Grosser tobias at grosser.es
Fri May 24 19:53:32 PDT 2013

On 05/24/2013 01:39 PM, Thirumurthi, Ashok wrote:
> Thanks for putting together the report, Sylvestre,
> Do you have any indication that lcov/gcov has any support for dynamically loaded shared libraries?  Note that much of lldb consists of plug-ins that are platform or architecture specific, and these are on the critical path for coverage.  For instance, the report shows 0% coverage for many directories in lldb/source like /Expression and /DataFormatters, whereas the current test suite should give us something...

Polly is run as a shared object and I can see code coverage for Polly. 
So there seems to be at least some support for shared libraries.


More information about the lldb-dev mailing list