[Lldb-commits] [clang] [clang-tools-extra] [compiler-rt] [flang] [lld] [lldb] [llvm] [mlir] [openmp] [pstl] Finally formalise our defacto line-ending policy (PR #86318)

David Blaikie via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 25 11:47:44 PDT 2024


dwblaikie wrote:

> For those files in the repository that do need CRLF endings, I've adopted a policy of eol=crlf which means that git will store them in history with LF, but regardless of user config, they'll be checked out in tree with CRLF.

This ^ seems a bit problematic to me, though (where the contents of the repo isn't representative of the bits we want - but perhaps it's schrodinger's line endings & it doesn't matter if it's always checked out as crlf - though if we one day converted to another source control system, would that be a problem? are there some things that examine the underlying/"real" repo contents?) - what would be the cost to using `eol=input` as you've done for the mixed line ending case? below \=

> There also appears to be a single test,
clang/test/Frontend/rewrite-includes-mixed-eol-crlf.[ch] which needs mixed line endings. This one uses eol=input to preserve it as-is.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86318


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list