[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D126259: Add the ability to specify signal actions (pass, stop or notify) for a signal before a process is created
Jim Ingham via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 24 15:44:48 PDT 2022
jingham added a comment.
In D126259#3535004 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126259#3535004>, @clayborg wrote:
> In D126259#3534997 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126259#3534997>, @jingham wrote:
>
>> Don't allow setting signal actions by signal number before you have a process.
>
> I understand
>
>> We don't know what signal 20 is going to end up being till we have a process, so allowing this by number doesn't make sense.
>
> I am saying that it would be a good idea to make sure an error is returned when you do try and set a signal by number before a process exists and make sure there is a test that covers this if it isn't already in the current patch.
I think we crossed paths. I added that in the last update of the diff. The test is TestHandleProcess.py:20, and the code to enforce it starts around 1671 of CommandObjectProcess.cpp.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D126259/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D126259
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list