[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D68908: remove somewhat dangerous 'd'(etach) and 'k'(ill) shortcuts
    Greg Clayton via Phabricator via lldb-commits 
    lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
       
    Sat Jul 25 15:48:40 PDT 2020
    
    
  
clayborg added a comment.
So it seems like we should be either moving everything to the process menu, or keeping everything and introducing a confirmation dialog for any dangerous commands (kill, both detaches). This patch seems to keep some dangerous commands (detach suspended), remove one (detach), and add another (kill).
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Core/IOHandler.cpp:3766
-        {'d', "Detach and resume process"},
         {'D', "Detach with process suspended"},
         {'h', "Show help dialog"},
----------------
Do we really want to remove 'd' and not 'D' as well? We now handle this in the process menu right?
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Core/IOHandler.cpp:4331
-    case 'd': // 'd' == detach and let run
     case 'D': // 'D' == detach and keep stopped
     {
----------------
Do we really want to remove 'd' and not 'D' as well? We now handle this in the process menu right?
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Core/IOHandler.cpp:4340-4349
-    case 'k':
-      // 'k' == kill
-      {
-        ExecutionContext exe_ctx =
-            m_debugger.GetCommandInterpreter().GetExecutionContext();
-        if (exe_ctx.HasProcessScope())
-          exe_ctx.GetProcessRef().Destroy(false);
----------------
Is this not handled in the process menu? 'k' seems dangerous. Either that or we can introduce a confirmation dialog?
Repository:
  rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D68908/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68908
    
    
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list