[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D76168: CPlusPlusNameParser does not handles templated operator< properly

Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 18 09:14:28 PDT 2020


labath added a comment.

In D76168#1925176 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168#1925176>, @shafik wrote:

> Long-term I would like to modify clang to stop doing that for LLDB, but LLDB will still have to support older compilers for a while. So I think this fix is still needed.


So is this some alternative to D75761 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75761> (where we'd use CPlusPlusNameParser to decode DW_AT_names of templates)? If so, I think that is an interesting direction, but beware that that class is kind of meant for processing the demangler output. The contents of DW_AT_name looks a bit like a demangled name, but in reality there are some deviations from that format (which is why I did not recommend this direction initially -- but I am not against it either).

Also it looks like llvm and gnu demanglers disagree on the exact formatting of demangled operator names:

  $ c++filt _ZlsI1AEvT_S1_
  void operator<< <A>(A, A)
  $ llvm-cxxfilt _ZlsI1AEvT_S1_
  void operator<<<A>(A, A)

I think the gnu format is superior (and unambiguous) so we could change llvm to match that -- and this change probably won't require any kind of compatibility hacks.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168





More information about the lldb-commits mailing list