[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D62859: [CMake] Add special case for processing LLDB_DOTEST_ARGS
Stefan Gränitz via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 4 11:42:31 PDT 2019
sgraenitz added a comment.
Thanks for your feedback. I should have mentioned that this is pretty much a draft. For now I was happy it works at all.
In D62859#1529498 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62859#1529498>, @stella.stamenova wrote:
> I don't think that this would apply very well to Visual Studio with the current change because it is likely that if you are using VS to build LLDB, you also used VS to build the dependencies.
> I think a better change would be to allow a parameter to be passed like your suggested `LLDB_PROVIDED_NINJA_BUILD_TREE=On` (except don't use Ninja in the name, how the tree came about is not important and it could also be make or a tree copied from another build) and then use that and LLDB_BUILT_STANDALONE for the pivot. Then if someone provides the new parameter, they know what they are doing and we can expect it to work for Xcode and VS both.
Yes, then it's either that or what Pavel proposed.
In D62859#1529666 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62859#1529666>, @labath wrote:
> > LLDB_PROVIDED_NINJA_BUILD_TREE=On
> An even better option would be to get the llvm build to export the fact whether it was built with a multi-config generator or not. Then the user wouldn't have to provide anything, and things would "just work". :)
Yes, I will check if I can store it in LLVMConfig.cmake
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
More information about the lldb-commits