[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54454: Be more permissive in what we consider a variable name.

[Jim Ingham via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

jingham added a comment.

We do also handle [], though it isn't obvious to me after a quick glance where that gets done.  This is a little cheesy because the name of the child that we are finding with [0] is actually "[0]", so you just have to be careful not to consume that when you consume the variable name.

I don't remember any other special aggregate names like this.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D54454