[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D54056: Add SetAllowJIT (the SBExpressionOptions equivalent of "expression --allow-jit")

[Jim Ingham via lldb-commits]

Thanks for doing this!  Why do we care about the file name of the test, shouldn't we be using the test class name for everything (that one I did remember to change...)

Jim


> On Nov 3, 2018, at 11:18 PM, Jan Kratochvil via Phabricator <reviews at reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> jankratochvil added a comment.
> 
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54056#1286635, @davide wrote:
> 
>> I don't think anybody will look at this until Monday, so if you want a quick fix you might consider renaming the test yourself.
> 
> 
> Checked in as: https://reviews.llvm.org/rLLDB346089
> 
> 
> Repository:
>  rL LLVM
> 
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D54056
> 
> 
>