[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D47838: [lldb-mi] Re-implement MI -exec-step command.

[Alexander Polyakov via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

polyakov.alex added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47838#1124730, @labath wrote:

> I don't know if there is any spec about what the gdb-mi protocol should use for thread identification, but I think the most important part is to be consistent. If you use indexes in one place and tid's in another you'll confuse the hell out of clients trying to talk to lldb-mi.


Due to https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Threads.html, gdb has its own thread numbers for each thread of an inferior.
So we should do the same, I guess.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D47838