[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r319840 - [CMake] Use PRIVATE in target_link_libraries for executables

Tue Dec 5 14:24:32 PST 2017

Oh, I thought you meant specifically on a Windows build machine, not just targeting Windows. I've already submitted it, but I can do some more testing locally as well (and I can always revert if anything seems broken). With that said, http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86-windows-msvc2015/builds/16127 is happy, at least.

From: Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2017 at 2:21 PM
To: Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com>
Cc: "lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org" <lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r319840 - [CMake] Use PRIVATE in target_link_libraries for executables

Oh come now, we have cross-compilation ;-)

That said, I'd like to try this out locally before you submit, but it might be tomorrow.

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 2:19 PM Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com<mailto:smeenai at fb.com>> wrote:
I didn't, because I didn't have easy access to a Windows LLVM setup (I need to get that working again). I don't see a reason for many platform-specific differences here, but I am monitoring the bots closely to make sure nothing breaks.

From: Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com<mailto:zturner at google.com>>
Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2017 at 2:07 PM
To: Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com<mailto:smeenai at fb.com>>
Cc: "lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org>" <lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org>>
Subject: Re: [Lldb-commits] [lldb] r319840 - [CMake] Use PRIVATE in target_link_libraries for executables

Can you / did you try this on Windows?  I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work, but I remember having difficulty with all this CMake some time ago.

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:50 PM Shoaib Meenai via lldb-commits <lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
Author: smeenai
Date: Tue Dec  5 13:49:56 2017
New Revision: 319840

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=319840&view=rev<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject-3Frev-3D319840-26view-3Drev&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=CnV7n6Ko5mCcbjGWZ4ObFe8oScFwBWBh6b5DQozSnxE&s=jgpur1XN4mrubAWTFVwv6eiWiVm-VcjEBApZCdrjLNs&e=>
Log:
[CMake] Use PRIVATE in target_link_libraries for executables

We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.

Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.

Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).

Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D40823&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=CnV7n6Ko5mCcbjGWZ4ObFe8oScFwBWBh6b5DQozSnxE&s=F1t4w68fsg6CjlgcP1s0P93A8ScHtutPHn3pgJt9jJo&e=>


Modified:
    lldb/trunk/cmake/modules/AddLLDB.cmake
    lldb/trunk/unittests/CMakeLists.txt
    lldb/trunk/unittests/Interpreter/CMakeLists.txt

Modified: lldb/trunk/cmake/modules/AddLLDB.cmake
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/cmake/modules/AddLLDB.cmake?rev=319840&r1=319839&r2=319840&view=diff<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_lldb_trunk_cmake_modules_AddLLDB.cmake-3Frev-3D319840-26r1-3D319839-26r2-3D319840-26view-3Ddiff&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=CnV7n6Ko5mCcbjGWZ4ObFe8oScFwBWBh6b5DQozSnxE&s=VabZwbj9vO8KCXgjqdmhFSGEMTkOFstdqG6pzEV5WpM&e=>
==============================================================================

--- lldb/trunk/cmake/modules/AddLLDB.cmake (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/cmake/modules/AddLLDB.cmake Tue Dec  5 13:49:56 2017
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ function(add_lldb_executable name)
   list(APPEND LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS ${ARG_LINK_COMPONENTS})
   add_llvm_executable(${name} ${ARG_UNPARSED_ARGUMENTS})

-  target_link_libraries(${name} ${ARG_LINK_LIBS})
+  target_link_libraries(${name} PRIVATE ${ARG_LINK_LIBS})
   set_target_properties(${name} PROPERTIES
     FOLDER "lldb executables")


Modified: lldb/trunk/unittests/CMakeLists.txt
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/unittests/CMakeLists.txt?rev=319840&r1=319839&r2=319840&view=diff<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_lldb_trunk_unittests_CMakeLists.txt-3Frev-3D319840-26r1-3D319839-26r2-3D319840-26view-3Ddiff&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=CnV7n6Ko5mCcbjGWZ4ObFe8oScFwBWBh6b5DQozSnxE&s=QVL5tF9VvVyPWpxaRvlsnKRNuc_JmyIraylLQViPPTs&e=>
==============================================================================
--- lldb/trunk/unittests/CMakeLists.txt (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/unittests/CMakeLists.txt Tue Dec  5 13:49:56 2017
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ function(add_lldb_unittest test_name)
     POST_BUILD
     COMMAND "${CMAKE_COMMAND}" -E make_directory ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/Inputs)

-  target_link_libraries(${test_name} ${ARG_LINK_LIBS})
+  target_link_libraries(${test_name} PRIVATE ${ARG_LINK_LIBS})
 endfunction()

 function(add_unittest_inputs test_name inputs)

Modified: lldb/trunk/unittests/Interpreter/CMakeLists.txt
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/unittests/Interpreter/CMakeLists.txt?rev=319840&r1=319839&r2=319840&view=diff<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_lldb_trunk_unittests_Interpreter_CMakeLists.txt-3Frev-3D319840-26r1-3D319839-26r2-3D319840-26view-3Ddiff&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=CnV7n6Ko5mCcbjGWZ4ObFe8oScFwBWBh6b5DQozSnxE&s=mKTxMMXxgDo1bn5EEsAyKTP_piQ03SMItebwHr0t4Kk&e=>
==============================================================================
--- lldb/trunk/unittests/Interpreter/CMakeLists.txt (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/unittests/Interpreter/CMakeLists.txt Tue Dec  5 13:49:56 2017
@@ -8,5 +8,6 @@ add_lldb_unittest(InterpreterTests
   )

 target_link_libraries(InterpreterTests
+  PRIVATE
   ${PYTHON_LIBRARY}
   )


_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org<mailto:lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org>
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_lldb-2Dcommits&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=CnV7n6Ko5mCcbjGWZ4ObFe8oScFwBWBh6b5DQozSnxE&s=gDB7hBPs481QNdvPe15aBj56UoMVTKLPURlbXP2pjgQ&e=>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20171205/497f2f3b/attachment-0001.html>
