[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D39215: Default to using in-tree clang for building test executables

[Zachary Turner via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

zturner added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39215#905259, @ted wrote:

> We build lldb, clang and tools for Hexagon only, and call them hexagon-lldb, hexagon-clang, etc. The test infrastructure is smart enough to pick up hexagon-lldb-mi if we tell it to run with hexagon-lldb using --executable; will it be smart enough to run an in-tree hexagon-clang?
>
> @labath, we run on Windows using hexagon-clang and hexagon-clang++; don't forget the embedded cases when choosing compilers and running tests.
>
> I'm all for removing redundant variables.


I haven't checked the logic for deducing the cxx from the c, and vice versa.  But if it's as simple as just adding or removing ++ from the end of the executable name, it should work.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D39215