[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D24591: [LIT] First pass of LLDB LIT support

[Sean Callanan via lldb-commits]

I agree completely with tackling the easy stuff first.
That said, the easy stuff (probably >50% of the testsuite) doesn't even require command-line interaction and is just of the form "stop here, run this one expression, maybe print this variable using 'frame variab'e'"
I would argue that we can find a simpler way to handle these cases than feeding lldb command lines to the command-line parser.
To be clear, that simpler way is not the SB API, it's probably a special-purpose language that knows how to stop at breakpoints and inspect locals/run expressions.  That's all it does.
The SB API / command line parser argument is for what I'd argue are the complex cases, and I think we should deal with those later because they're both technically hairy and seem to attract more discussion.

Sean

> On Sep 14, 2016, at 5:57 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
> 
> 1. get all the easy stuff out of the way first, such as the tests in this patch (and there are probably at least 100 more that are just as easy)
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20160914/332f0bfe/attachment.html>