[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] Reduce number of threads in lldb-mi.

Ilia K ki.stfu at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 05:56:56 PST 2015


> After this revision goes in, it will not be possible to give the name of the executable on command line and lldb-mi accepting it. This functionality is already stubbed out in the code by he following #ifdef so we will not lose anything.


Why? We can use ExecuteCommand instead of InjectCommand in LocalDebugSessionStartupInjectCommands. I have tested it, and it works.

> For posix system, it is even possible to make lldb-mi a single thread app. But on


windows, it is difficult to wait on stdin with timeout like what you can do with
select. So next best thing is to use 2 threads instead of 3.

Can you explain me,  why? I don't mind, I'm just wondering.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D7746

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/






More information about the lldb-commits mailing list