[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] Fix some posixy assumptions that were used during RunShellCommand
zturner at google.com
Fri Dec 5 17:39:49 PST 2014
If its not urgent i can revert in a couple hours, but I don't have access
to a machine at the moment.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:35 PM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
> Can you revert for me? sorry about the break. I will have to fix it Monday.
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:27 PM <jingham at apple.com> wrote:
>> Yes, as checked in it didn't even build (fixed in r223559.) But then
>> "run" fails with:
>> /bin/sh: exec /usr/bin/arch -arch x86_64 /Volumes/ThePlayground/Users/j
>> ingham/Projects/Sketch/build/Debug/Sketch.app/Contents/MacOS/Sketch: No
>> such file or directory
>> error: process exited with status 127
>> But "process launch" with the same binary works correctly.
>> > On Dec 5, 2014, at 5:19 PM, Greg Clayton <clayborg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This breaks the entire test suite (Jim Ingham informed me), "run" which
>> is aliased to "process launch --shell" no longer works. Please revert this.
>> > REPOSITORY
>> > rL LLVM
>> > http://reviews.llvm.org/D6553
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > lldb-commits mailing list
>> > lldb-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
>> lldb-commits mailing list
>> lldb-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lldb-commits