[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] First cut of PowerPC(64) support in LLDB.

[Greg Clayton]

Ah, I see what you mean about the static assert. In that case can you just use the "ppc" and "ppc64" entries? Or rename them to be "powerpc" and "powerpc64"? We want our triples to match what llvm uses for PowerPC so if llvm doesn't use "ppc" or "ppc64", just rename the entries in the "g_core_definitions" table, otherwise, use the "ppc" and "ppc64" entries.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D5988