[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r220511 - Fix a problem where an SBType was advertising its static type class even though a dynamic type was available. Solves rdar://18744420

[Enrico Granata]

Unpleasantly enough, even skipping the test is not currently a thing for inline tests as far as I can tell
The way to disable it would be to revert it - or comment out everything in the .py file
I think it’s interesting enough to have facilities to apply attributes (@skip, @expectedFail, …) to lldbinline-based tests - let me see if Sean and I can come up with something today

> On Oct 27, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
> 
> Would it be worth disabling the test until we get it figured out?
> 
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org <mailto:emaste at freebsd.org>> wrote:
> On 24 October 2014 17:27, Enrico Granata <egranata at apple.com <mailto:egranata at apple.com>> wrote:
> > Sean,
> > is there any provision in lldbinline for saying “Darwin-only”? or any other
> > attribute for that matter...
> 
> Ping?  I would really like to get this sorted out ASAP so that we can
> keep on top of any new regressions.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-commits mailing list
> lldb-commits at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:lldb-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits>
> 

Thanks,
- Enrico
📩 egranata@.com ☎️ 27683




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20141027/5b81b75c/attachment.html>