[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r187057 - Don't rely on C99 for loop initializers in test case

Stefanus Du Toit stefanus.du.toit at intel.com
Wed Jul 24 10:48:04 PDT 2013


Author: sdt
Date: Wed Jul 24 12:48:04 2013
New Revision: 187057

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=187057&view=rev
Log:
Don't rely on C99 for loop initializers in test case

This allows compilation of the test case with GCC 4.8.


Modified:
    lldb/trunk/test/expression_command/call-restarts/lotta-signals.c

Modified: lldb/trunk/test/expression_command/call-restarts/lotta-signals.c
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/test/expression_command/call-restarts/lotta-signals.c?rev=187057&r1=187056&r2=187057&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lldb/trunk/test/expression_command/call-restarts/lotta-signals.c (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/test/expression_command/call-restarts/lotta-signals.c Wed Jul 24 12:48:04 2013
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ int
 call_me (int some_value)
 {
   int ret_val = 0;
-  for (int i = 0; i < some_value; i++)
+  int i;
+  for (i = 0; i < some_value; i++)
     {
       int result = 0;
       if (i%2 == 0)
@@ -37,7 +38,8 @@ int
 call_me_nosig (int some_value)
 {
   int ret_val = 0;
-  for (int i = 0; i < some_value; i++)
+  int i;
+  for (i = 0; i < some_value; i++)
     weird_value += i % 4;
 
   nosig_no += some_value;





More information about the lldb-commits mailing list