[PATCH] D56139: [pstl] Fix compile errors when PARALLEL_POLICIES is disabled
Thomas Rodgers via Phabricator
reviews at reviews.llvm.org
Tue Jan 15 13:00:05 PST 2019
rodgert marked an inline comment as done.
rodgert added a comment.
See inline comment
================
Comment at: include/pstl/internal/algorithm_impl.h:181
template <class _ExecutionPolicy, class _RandomAccessIterator, class _Size, class _Function, class _IsVector>
_RandomAccessIterator
----------------
Shouldn't this definition be protected by #ifdef __PSTL_USE_PAR_POLICIES?
Sure, it will fail to compile because it calls something that is __PSTL_USE_PAR_POLICIES but what was it ldionne said about being consistent recently?
Repository:
rPSTL pstl
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56139/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56139
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list