[PATCH] D55791: [libcxx] Simplify conditional definition of _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ALIGNED_ALLOCATION
Marshall Clow via Phabricator
reviews at reviews.llvm.org
Mon Jan 7 08:00:28 PST 2019
mclow.lists added a comment.
In general, we *do* protect against user-defined defines.
This, and defining stuff as negative (`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_XXX`) lets users disable parts of the libc++ functionality by defining the macros.
So I think we should leave this "as is"
Repository:
rCXX libc++
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55791/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D55791
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list