[flang-commits] [PATCH] D150159: [flang] CUDA Fortran - part 1/5: parsing

[Andrzej Warzynski via Phabricator via flang-commits]

awarzynski added a comment.

In D150159#4338550 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150159#4338550>, @MehdiChinoune wrote:

> Shouldn't an RFC be opened before start upstreaming CUDA stuff.

CUDA is very widely adopted and I doubt that anyone would object to this. The changes in the driver are very non-intrusive and I see no need to discuss this more widely. Definitely not objecting to an RFC (in fact, a short PSA would be nice), but I'm happy for this to land without further advertising.

> If for example Intel invents a new extension based OneAPI/SYCL, Should Flang supports it?

If there is a critical mass of users that would like to use a particular extension then it should be supported. It doesn't matter whether it comes from "company A" or "company B". As for SYCL specifically, isn't that a purely C++ extension? What's the relevance here?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D150159/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D150159