[flang-commits] [flang] [flang] Fix length handling in character kind implicit conversion (PR #74586)

[via flang-commits]

jeanPerier wrote:

> I wonder about the update message, which discusses setting the new RHS length. Should this say the new LHS length?

Thanks for the review! The "new RHS" is a new value converted from the RHS of the original fortran code. The updated code is producing this "new RHS" and was incorrectly setting its MLIR type length to the one of the assignment LHS (instead of preserving the one from the original RHS).


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74586