[clangd-dev] Code completion overload folding

[Sam McCall via clangd-dev]

Yeah, merging only results from the same header makes sense to me. It's not
in the prototype because

I'd personally find it hard to give up the signature for non-overloads (and
non-functions). But this does strike me as a place a (second) option might
make sense.
I assumed people would want the popular/likely overload bundles exploded
into individual items, but it seems that's just me. Maybe
explode-after-full-name is a good fallback for editors that don't support
signature help?

[6 overloads] is better than [overloaded] for sure. I was just too tired to
fix it on Friday :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/clangd-dev/attachments/20180611/14a8e4a7/attachment.html>