<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 10:05, Yuri via cfe-dev <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Clang-6 has these 2 regressions:<br>
<br>
* <a href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36915" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36915</a></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is a bugfix rather than a regression. Clang <=5 was miscompiling your testcase due to broken behavior of a GNU extension.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
* <a href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36916" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36916</a></blockquote><div><br></div><div>As Paul mentioned, this diagnostic is correct; the only thing you're allowed to do with builtin functions is make direct calls to them. Sorry the diagnostic message doesn't explain that.<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
You didn't fix them, and still released clang-7.<br>
<br>
<br>
Yuri<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>