<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>Bonjour,</div><div><br></div><div>Welcome! By the way, <span class="gmail-post-author gmail-vcard"><span class="gmail-fn">Reshabh and myself wrote this blog post about that:</span></span> <a href="http://blog.llvm.org/2018/09/integration-of-libc-and-openmp-packages.html">http://blog.llvm.org/2018/09/integration-of-libc-and-openmp-packages.html</a> <br></div><div><br></div><div>I didn't investigating replacing libgcc. Would you have some doc on this to evaluate the complexity?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks<br></div><div>Sylvestre</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le dim. 14 oct. 2018 à 17:32, Franz Fehringer via cfe-dev <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear clang community,<br>
<br>
Today i noticed that on <a href="http://apt.llvm.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">apt.llvm.org</a> now with clang / llvm 7 there are<br>
packages for libcxx / libcxxabi (not available in previous versions),<br>
thanks.<br>
Which amounts to the next level of "perfection": Would it be possible to<br>
craft packages which depend on compiler-rt instead of libgcc?<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
<br>
Franz<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>