<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hello</div><div><br></div><div>That could be a nice gsoc project for next year :)</div><div>Would you mind opening a bug here <a href="https://bugs.llvm.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Packaging">https://bugs.llvm.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Packaging</a> + deb packages with the details?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div>Sylvestre</div><div><br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le dim. 11 nov. 2018 à 13:41, Franz Fehringer <<a href="mailto:fehrin2@googlemail.com">fehrin2@googlemail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Hi Sylvestre,<br>
<br>
Thx again, and i indeed did a build without any dependency on libgcc
(clang / libcxx / lld / compiler-rt / libunwind ... version 6.0.1)
on Ubuntu 16.04.<br>
The main difficulty was the dependency of compiler-rt on libunwind
and in the end the result was not 100% satisfying since on every
link -L/usr/local/lib had to be given to not pull in the wrong
(system) libunwind (in fact i removed the system libunwind-dev, link
line without hassles now, but not 100% satisfying as well).<br>
Not depending (runtime dependency) on libgcc would be a further
improvement for <a href="http://apt.llvm.org" target="_blank">apt.llvm.org</a> IMO.<br>
There still would be a dependency an crtbegin / crtend, but this is
lacking an official solution by now and is only a link time
dependency.<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
<br>
Franz<br>
<br>
P.S.<br>
<br>
Another possible improvement here would be lld supporting file based
configuration (e.g. /usr/local lib first) and / or linker scripts.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="m_3171674198511050162moz-cite-prefix">Am 11.11.2018 um 12:49 schrieb
Sylvestre Ledru:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Bonjour,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Welcome! By the way, <span class="m_3171674198511050162gmail-post-author m_3171674198511050162gmail-vcard"><span class="m_3171674198511050162gmail-fn">Reshabh and myself
wrote this blog post about that:</span></span> <a href="http://blog.llvm.org/2018/09/integration-of-libc-and-openmp-packages.html" target="_blank">http://blog.llvm.org/2018/09/integration-of-libc-and-openmp-packages.html</a>
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I didn't investigating replacing libgcc. Would you have
some doc on this to evaluate the complexity?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks<br>
</div>
<div>Sylvestre</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">Le dim. 14 oct. 2018 à 17:32, Franz Fehringer via
cfe-dev <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear clang
community,<br>
<br>
Today i noticed that on <a href="http://apt.llvm.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">apt.llvm.org</a>
now with clang / llvm 7 there are<br>
packages for libcxx / libcxxabi (not available in previous
versions),<br>
thanks.<br>
Which amounts to the next level of "perfection": Would it be
possible to<br>
craft packages which depend on compiler-rt instead of libgcc?<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
<br>
Franz<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div>