<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
<span style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">I tried the posted code on SO and it also fails to compile on clang 5.0svn.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Michael Haidl<br>
<br>
Mit TouchDown von meinem Android-Telefon gesendet (www.symantec.com)<br>
<br>
<span style="color:black">-----Original Message----- <br>
<b>From:</b> Diana Picus via llvm-dev [llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org]<br>
<b>Received:</b> Montag, 03 Juli 2017, 10:59<br>
<b>To:</b> Christoph Höger [christoph.hoeger@celeraone.com]; cfe-dev [cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org]<br>
<b>CC:</b> llvm-dev [llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org]<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [llvm-dev] type traits bug in clang 4.0.0?<br>
<br>
</span></span></div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">+clang mailing list, which has lots more C++/clang experts<br>
<br>
On 3 July 2017 at 10:42, Christoph Höger via llvm-dev<br>
<llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:<br>
> Dear all,<br>
><br>
> I found this strange behavior, when inspecting some legacy build that did<br>
> not compile after an upgrade of several libraries and clang:<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44846377/what-is-the-reason-behind-instable-type-traits">
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44846377/what-is-the-reason-behind-instable-type-traits</a><br>
><br>
> I got no conclusive answer, but a comment that indicates that this might<br>
> indeed be a bug in clang. Since I am neither a C++ expert nor familiar with<br>
> clang, I would very much appreciate if some expert could:<br>
><br>
> 1. verify that this is indeed a bug<br>
> 2. help me to formulate this as a constructive report (i.e. what is actually<br>
> going wrong here w.r.t. the C++ standard) and/or further reduce the test<br>
> case<br>
><br>
> thanks a lot,<br>
><br>
> Christoph<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
> llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org<br>
> <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev</a><br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>