<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:06 PM Hal Finkel via cfe-dev <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" class="gmail_msg">
<p class="gmail_msg"><br class="gmail_msg">
</p>
<div class="m_-4675691131510924527moz-cite-prefix gmail_msg">On 03/21/2017 08:45 AM, Hubert Tong
wrote:<br class="gmail_msg">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="gmail_msg">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_msg">
<div class="gmail_msg">This question was explored in an other context here:<br class="gmail_msg">
<a href="http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/2013-January/002544.html" class="gmail_msg" target="_blank">http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/2013-January/002544.html</a><br class="gmail_msg">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br class="gmail_msg"></div><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" class="gmail_msg">
Very interesting, thanks! So the conclusion was that, "
The ABI will need to specify the layout of closure types with weak
linkage."</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Are you basing that on what the document does or the discussion in the thread? Because I don't really see a conclusion in the thread. I see John pointing out three options and suggestion one which is not what you claim is the conclusion here:</div><div><a href="http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/2013-January/002544.html">http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/2013-January/002544.html</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>I don't see any real disagreement but I also don't see any real discussion past that email and brief follow-ups....</div></div></div>