<div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px"> I think we should go with 20a rather than 20x, because we may run out of letters otherwise when sticking to a 3yr cycle. However, we should coordinate with the gcc folks to be consistent. </span><font color="#888888" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px"></font><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">-Aaron</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mar 7, 2017 7:32 AM, "Piotr Padlewski via cfe-dev" <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">It is clear to me that it should be -std=c++-2ź.<div>But to be serious, it make sense to have some sort of -std=c++-next. </div><div>The other idea is that probably there won't be more than 3 standars in next decade, so starting with C++2x should be sufficient.</div><div><br></div><div>Piotr</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-03-07 17:57 GMT+01:00 Keane, Erich via cfe-dev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="m_-8592136740218013900m_4176080061242398580WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">I don’t know personally, though googling doesn’t really give me any hint.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Just thought maybe we could be the first to the punch here
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:#1f497d">J</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="m_-8592136740218013900_m_4176080061242398580__MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Hubert Tong [mailto:<a href="mailto:hubert.reinterpretcast@gmail.com" target="_blank">hubert.reinterpretcast<wbr>@gmail.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, March 7, 2017 8:37 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Keane, Erich <<a href="mailto:erich.keane@intel.com" target="_blank">erich.keane@intel.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> cfe-dev <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cfe-dev] New flag for C++Next<u></u><u></u></span></p><div><div class="m_-8592136740218013900h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Do we know what GCC is going to do?<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- HT<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Keane, Erich via cfe-dev <<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal">As many of you know, the committee sent C++17 for ISO approval, so any further features voted (including a few other extensions that we have) are likely targeted for a "C++20" or so. I was wondering if there was going to be another 'temporary'
flag (ala c++1x,y,z), and what it was going to be? Are we starting back over at 'x', continuing to 'a', or forgoing it entirely?<br>
<br>
-Erich<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>