<div dir="ltr">Hi Yuri,<div><br></div><div>this was discussed in a lot of detail in the thread (<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120430/057199.html">http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120430/057199.html</a>). The consensus was that there should be a separate fortran frontend, since the language is fairly different from C/C++ (which clang specializes in).</div><div><br></div><div>Nico</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Yuri via cfe-dev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">FreeBSD switched to clang as a major compiler, but all fortran parts still require gcc. Since C++ code built with gcc and clang can't be mixed, C++ projects requiring fortran generally don't work in FreeBSD now (mostly math software).<br>
<br>
Is clang going to support fortran?<br>
<br>
Yuri<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>