<div dir="ltr">Fedora looks OK, openSUSE not so much, check gets stuck at 90% on x64 but test suite passes OK, on x86 build succeeds but test suite fails saying 'import spec' no module found. </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Daniel Sanders via Release-testers <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:release-testers@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">release-testers@lists.llvm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Here's the status for my builds so far.<br>
<br>
clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8.tar.xz (sha1sum: 2b546efa5bab19d6711771ef31711d07b4a3f23f)<br>
Native:<br>
All ok<br>
Cross compiling to various MIPS targets:<br>
16 out of 23 configs passed<br>
1 out of the remaining 7 failed a small number of tests with a timeout. I expect these will pass when I re-run them.<br>
Remaining 6 configs still running...<br>
<br>
clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz (sha1sum: b46221e1bb54255e9e060f06bb72bb2ba630ff15)<br>
Failed to run check-all due to tsan'd libc++ build failing<br>
PR26278 - My fix for this was committed just after the rc2 tag so in order to get some check-all results, I applied those four patches (r25966[1456]) and re-ran check-all.<br>
PR26369 - Several failures related to the lack of -latomic which is needed for 64-bit atomics.<br>
PR26476 - One new failure in libc++ (I probably just missed it amongst the others). Apparently std::regex_traits says that '-' doesn't belong to the 'w' class but only on big-endian.<br>
check-all appears to hang at 99%. I'll look into this.<br>
LNT (using the clean rc2)<br>
1 of 3 passed successfully, the other two are still running<br>
<br>
clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz (sha1sum: 9f89cccfdb5cf6a27138b84a631003c4a04f456d)<br>
Build almost ok. I only have failures related to PR26369.<br>
LNT just started.<br>
<span class=""><br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: lldb-dev [mailto:<a href="mailto:lldb-dev-bounces@lists.llvm.org">lldb-dev-bounces@lists.llvm.org</a>] On Behalf Of Hans<br>
> Wennborg via lldb-dev<br>
> Sent: 02 February 2016 21:16<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:release-testers@lists.llvm.org">release-testers@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
> Cc: llvm-dev; cfe-dev; openmp-dev (<a href="mailto:openmp-dev@lists.llvm.org">openmp-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>); LLDB Dev<br>
> Subject: [lldb-dev] [3.8 Release] RC2 has been tagged<br>
><br>
> Dear testers,<br>
><br>
> Release Candidate 2 has just been tagged [1]. Please build, test, and<br>
> upload to the sftp.<br>
><br>
> I know there are still outstanding issues from RC1, but there have<br>
> been a lot of merges going into the branch and I think it's time for<br>
> another round of RC testing.<br>
><br>
> This RC comes a little behind schedule, sorry about that, but I'm<br>
> still optimistic about hitting the target of releasing towards the end<br>
> of February.<br>
><br>
> Thanks for all the work you've put into this release so far!<br>
><br>
> Hans<br>
><br>
> [1] <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/2016-" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/2016-</a><br>
> February/009739.html<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
</span>> lldb-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Release-testers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Release-testers@lists.llvm.org">Release-testers@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>