<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:01 AM, David Chisnall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:David.Chisnall@cl.cam.ac.uk" target="_blank">David.Chisnall@cl.cam.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 14 Jul 2015, at 06:29, Andrew Parker <<a href="mailto:andrew.j.c.parker@gmail.com">andrew.j.c.parker@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> These are non-standard GNU extensions, even in C++11 (as far as I read the standard at least).<br>
<br>
</span>If anyone in WG21 (Chandler?) is reading this, it would be great to have this omission fixed in C++17 - it’s currently a big interoperability problem for using C headers from C++.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>It's a constraint violation in C, too.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Even if they were explicitly not permitted in classes that were used in inheritance, it would be a big help.<br>
<br>
David<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-dev@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>