<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Reid Kleckner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rnk@google.com" target="_blank">rnk@google.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="">On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Nico Weber <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:thakis@chromium.org" target="_blank">thakis@chromium.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">The dynamic matcher stuff also takes forever to compile – does the patch that's out for review to make /bigobj not required impact compile time too? I'd expect that it'd make things faster.</div>

</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>+1 to this.</div><div><br></div><div>Also, MinGW probably doesn't support /bigobj, so we will hit the problem there if we haven't already.</div></div></div></div></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>I believe trunk MinGW actually does: <a href="https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-03/msg00110.html">https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-03/msg00110.html</a></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
cfe-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-dev@cs.uiuc.edu">cfe-dev@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>