<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><p dir="ltr">Hi Jevin,</p>
<p dir="ltr">Thanks for the suggestions. I will forward this to cfe-dev.</p><div>best,</div><div>chen</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mar 13, 2014 5:16 PM, "Jevin Sweval" <<a href="mailto:jevinsweval@gmail.com">jevinsweval@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex; position: static; z-index: auto;">
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Chen Li <<a href="mailto:meloli87@gmail.com">meloli87@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi folks,<br>
><br>
> Recently I happened to use some LLVM's intrinsics in my own project and would like to verify the correctness the intrinsics. I did several small c++ tests using the math library, and I found out that clang only compile "pow" to its standard C library intrinsics. I am curious about the reason and wonder if some of the intrinsic is not working correctly in the current version?<br>
><br>
> thanks,<br>
> chen<br>
<br>
Have you tried using -fno-builtin? Also, this sounds like a question<br>
better suited for cfe-dev.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Jevin<br>
</blockquote></div>
</body></html>