<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">+Nick, who has been looking at similar things recently.<div><br><div><div>On Feb 12, 2014, at 1:06 PM, Vadim Chugunov <<a href="mailto:vadimcn@gmail.com">vadimcn@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>As it happens, I've already started massaging libunwind to make it a part of compiler-rt.<br>At the moment, I am shooting for the makefile build. Once that's done, I could use somebody's help to add it to cmake build system.<br>
<br></div>It would be nice if somebody could look into disentangling compiler-rt from clang. I think that at the least it should be build-able together with LLVM (i.e. by checking it out into llvm/projects) without clang involvement. Completely standalone builds would be a plus, if feasible.<br>
<br></div><div>Last but not the least: I still haven't heard anybody admitting to being a maintainer of compiler-rt :-) Somebody will need to review the patch and check it in...<br><br>Vadim<br></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Alexey Samsonov <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:samsonov@google.com" target="_blank">samsonov@google.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi David,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="">On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:22 PM, David Chisnall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:David.Chisnall@cl.cam.ac.uk" target="_blank">David.Chisnall@cl.cam.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On 12 Feb 2014, at 13:21, Alexey Samsonov <<a href="mailto:samsonov@google.com" target="_blank">samsonov@google.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM, David Chisnall <<a href="mailto:David.Chisnall@cl.cam.ac.uk" target="_blank">David.Chisnall@cl.cam.ac.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Are you going to move the unwind library there as part of the reorganisation?<br>
><br>
> No.<br>
<br>
</div>Given that the consensus appeared to be that this is where it belongs... why not? It seems strange to do a big reorganisation pass, but not do all of it.</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>To be honest, I haven't worked with the unwind library. I'm fine with moving it to compiler-rt, but this should probably be done by someone with a sufficient</div>
<div>knowledge of the library and/or its use cases. I'd be glad to provide any help, though.</div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div>-- <br><div>Alexey Samsonov, MSK</div>
</font></span></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
LLVM Developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu">LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu</a> <a href="http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/" target="_blank">http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
_______________________________________________<br>LLVM Developers mailing list<br><a href="mailto:LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu">LLVMdev@cs.uiuc.edu</a> <a href="http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu">http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu</a><br><a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>