<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Bill Wendling <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wendling@apple.com" target="_blank" class="cremed">wendling@apple.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On <span class="aBn">Feb 22, 2013</span>, at <span class="aBn">3:19 AM</span>, Chandler Carruth <<a href="mailto:chandlerc@google.com" class="cremed">chandlerc@google.com</a>> wrote:<br>

<br>
> On <span class="aBn">Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:15 AM</span>, Kostya Serebryany <<a href="mailto:kcc@google.com" class="cremed">kcc@google.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Do we also want to rename the LLVM attributes?<br>
><br>
> As long as you auto-upgrade the one which got released (address_safety), that seems fine to me.<br>
><br>
</div>Is an auto-upgrade necessary? We haven't released a clang/llvm with those attributes yet....</blockquote></div><br>I think 3.2 had the ASan one.</div></div>