<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On 23 May 2012, at 17:47, Howard Hinnant wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: 'Lucida Sans'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">Do you wish the demangled strings to be the same as the type name? Or do you wish to follow the g++ 4.6 convention? My recommendation is to have the demangled name be the same as what you would write in source code, which appears to be what you have labeled "Type:".</span></blockquote></div><br><div>Yes, that is exactly what I wish, as I tried to explain in my comments about gcc's behaviour. I indeed would like "Mangled" to be demangled into "Type".</div><div><br></div><div>Luc Bourhis</div><div><br></div></body></html>