<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Apr 13, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Douglas Gregor <<a href="mailto:dgregor@apple.com">dgregor@apple.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; display: inline !important; float: none; ">I just killed the index library. I think it's fine to pull some of the implementation details of libclang up into the other libraries. USR generation, for example, could even reasonably live in AST.</span></blockquote></div><br><div>I'm not so keen on that. USRs seem like an extension, not a core part of the ASTs themselves. Not even the CFG is in libAST.</div><div><br></div><div>Killing off the old libIndex is goodness, but I'd be fine with putting this in a new svelte libIndex, or possibly libAnalysis (where we have a variety of other things for "thinking" about code, e.g. the CFGs).</div></body></html>