<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Sep 12, 2011, at 2:22 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">If this patch is OK, or after any performance tuning you'd like to see here, I think I also better understand the FIXME in the analysis file. Do you actually want to switch the CFG to have *no* successors for blocks which contain a no-return element? That seems like it would be a very clean way of modelling this and would simplify the analysis for -Wreturn-type significantly.</span></blockquote></div><br><div>One possibility is to create a special empty block, "noreturn", that all blocks ending with a noreturn destructor/call jump to. That block would then have "Exit" as its successor. -Wreturn-type could just walk the predecessors of Exit, and skip this block.</div></body></html>