<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:22 AM, R P Herrold wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Tanya Lattner wrote:<br><br><blockquote type="cite">All,<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">We need to get all regressions fixed before 2.7 can continue onto pre-release2.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Please take a look at all release blockers:<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><a href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6586">http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6586</a><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">At this point, the release is delayed until further notice. If no bugs get fixed this week, then I see no other solution but to cancel the release or only qualify it for darwin (the only platform that is regression free).<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Linux developers, please help us out. We need more people fixing bugs!<br></blockquote><br>Umm -- The remaining blocker bugs in that ticket are:<br><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>6616 - warnings -- not a bar to release as I understood the release criteria<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>They are. We release without warnings.</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>6654 - a mish-mash of issues in a single bug, some seemingly related to deficiencies in the test suite code assignments<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>These are all valid regressions. Sure, its in a single bug (which I asked it to be separated out), but still they are regressions.</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>6696 - as I read it, a grey area as to proper behaviour, and not really a Linux issue so much as a correctness as to alignment issue under x86-64<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Its still a regression. The problem itself may not be Linux specific, but it was only found on Linux on that test case.</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>6725 - a possible optional test, either proposed as blocking or non-blocking<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It was declared a release blocker.</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>6778 - a Darwin issue as to Fortran test coverage<br><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#144FAE"><br></font></font></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div>I don't see that segmenting the release's scope to Darwin only is either accurate, nor that Darwin buildout is without regressions<br><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Darwin is currently compiling without warnings or errors. It also has no regressions in the test-suite or dejagnu test suite for both clang and llvm-gcc. So by our release criteria, it is currently the only platform that is regression free. I'd like Linux to be ready to release too, but if no one is helping fix bugs, then there isnt much I can do about it.</div><div><br></div><div>Please help fix what you can.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Tanya</div></div><div><br></div></body></html>