<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Greg McGary wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"> <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font size="+1">Clang has no target definitions for several LLVM targets, notably:<br> mips, xcore, ia64, alpha, cell<br> not to mention the non-machine targets:<br> MSIL, CppBackend, CBackend<br> <br> My personal interest is to observe a variety of LLVM target backends in action and use clang to provide input for them. Lacking experience and access to some of these, I probably won't be able to always provide complete& accurate sets of CPP predefines. Question: will you accept patches for new XXXTargetInfo classes that are possibly incompete/inaccurate, but still useful for LLVM experimentation?<br></font></div></blockquote></div><br><div>Yes, I strongly prefer that you try to get the predefines and builtin data types *close* though.</div><div><br></div><div>-Chris</div></body></html>