<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Aug 7, 2008, at 2:42 PM, Max Lybbert wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">The "Clang vs. XXX" page ( <a href="http://clang.llvm.org/comparison.html">http://clang.llvm.org/comparison.html</a> ), includes a note to "email cfe-dev if you think we should add another compiler to this list."<br><br>Tendra appears to have many of the features Clang is scheduled to have, including a BSD-like license and good semantic information. The main differnces I can see are that Tendra (1) has a C codebase, and (2) does not have Objective-C/Objective-C++ support. There are two competing projects, both about the same level of usability, at <a href="http://www.tendra.org">http://www.tendra.org</a> and <a href="http://www.ten15.org/">http://www.ten15.org/</a> .<br> </div></blockquote><br></div><div>It has a number if significant problems (C99, C++, GNU extension support etc), and my understanding is that the code base is difficult to deal with. I have not experimented with it or looked at the implementation in enough depth to know how useful it would be for non-codegen tasks though. The bigger problem with Tendra is that the project is effectively dead, or moving so glacially that is effectively dead (AFAIK).</div><div><br></div><div>Have you used Tendra before?</div><div><br></div><div>-Chris</div><br></body></html>